Thursday, May 02, 2024
29.0°F

Wallace City Council unanimously passes mask resolution

by JOSH McDONALDCHANSE WATSON
Local Editor | July 24, 2020 12:36 PM

WALLACE – The Wallace City Council unanimously voted in favor of a mask resolution during an emergency meeting Friday morning.

Wallace City Councilwoman Heather Branstetter vocally supported the unanimous decision by the council and highlighted how she’s proud of her city for taking the reins concerning the issue of wearing masks.

“We’ve been talking it over for a little while now and we decided that we would show some leadership,” Branstetter said. “We want to protect our little town, and we get more tourists here than anywhere else in the Silver Valley. We also have a high number of older residents to take into consideration.”

Branstetter also doesn’t subscribe to the anti-mask rhetoric that is running rampant across various mediums including social media platforms and would rather have her city follow the science laid out by leaders in the medical world.

“There’s a lot of people out there quoting pseudoscience,” Branstetter said. “But there is actual science to show that masks are effective in slowing the spread of this virus.”

Being that at this point the resolution is not an ordinance, actual enforcement of the resolution is difficult, but Branstetter hopes that residents will effectively hold each other accountable and that peer pressure might compel residents and visitors alike into complying with the resolution.

According to Wallace City Officials, the specifics of the resolution, which is effectively immediately, borrowed heavily from a similar mandate that passed earlier this month in McCall, Idaho, requiring that people wear face masks when in any indoor or outdoor public place, or in any otherwise unprotected social interaction while inside the city limits of Wallace.

By this order, public places are defined as but not limited to- retail business establishments, government offices, medical, educational, arts and recreational institutions, public transportation, including taxi cabs and ridesharing vehicles.

There are a few exemptions to the order, including:

  • Children under the age of 5.
  • Persons who cannot medically tolerate wearing a face covering. A person is not required to provide documentation demonstrating that the person cannot medically tolerate wearing a face covering.
  • Persons who are hearing impaired, or communicating with a person who is hearing impaired, where the ability to see the mouth is essential for communication.
  • Persons, including on-duty law-enforcement officers, for whom wearing a face covering would create a risk to the person related to their work, as determined by local, state, or federal regulators or workplace safety guidelines.
  • Persons who are obtaining a service involving the nose, face, or head for which temporary removal of the face covering is necessary to perform the service.
  • Persons who are eating or drinking at a restaurant or other establishment that offers food or beverage service, so long as the person is able to maintain a distance of 6 feet away from persons who are not members of the same household or party as the person.
  • Outdoor public places where a person can employ social distancing as recommended by CDC where the person is able to maintain a distance of 6-feet away from persons who are not members of the same household or party as the person.

There are currently no fines or penalties for not following the order, but the City Council could create some if they pass a city ordinance.

The resolution will remain in effect until Wallace Mayor Lynn Mogensen rescinds it.

This is a developing story and the News-Press is in the process of contacting city and county officials for comment.